The whole are argument basically boils down to is why my name, birthdate, and body are essentially asserting I am the second coming of Christ. This page is more of an in depth summery of this website in general. If one wants to know more, you have to check out some of the other pages or videos. There is a more detailed analysis of my place in the present found here than is found in the videos.
Table of Contents
After more than 15 years of thought, research, and observation, I have arrived at an explanation of this exclamation made about me in my school year book.
The Photo is an original scan. It is blurred and the underline was added after it was scanned by me
There are a lot of things that happened on the same day as any day in past years, the anniversaries we celebrate connect each separate day to the other times, yet in another sense each day is unique, everything each day gets a new chance at life.
This section details why 18 September 1994 is the most meaningful day for Christ to be born again
Before I start to list reasons, I want to say one thing that is different about this identifier. With the other two identifiers, the argument is about it being the same. The exact same name articulated. The exact same pure act occurring in my flesh. Yet, what is different about the date is it cannot be the exact same. If I was born at the exact same time as Christ, then I would be living in a time around the year 0, like 26 BCE. Therefore, this section is largely highlighting the amount of meaning for the specific present time I am located.
When I was Born
I was born on 18 September 1994.
It is 37.23 weeks after new years
And my birthday is the anniversary of my maternal grandmother’s birthday (18 September 1933)
This matters because she participated in my second creation and because it means that a relevant genetic pathology relating to my mother occurred first here when my grandmother was born since the pathology must have been with my mother from the beginning and since humans are born with there egg cells the mutated egg that became my mother first became real on 18 September 1933.
It is exactly 2000 years after the previous birth of Christ (he was born 6-4 BCE)
This is the exact moment referred to by Mayan astronomers who believed a new Son begotten and protected by Pauahtun would be conceived on on the day of Justice (Ok/TZ’I’) when the earth is closest to the sun (Earth’s perihelion), and they believed he would be born on a beginning that carries with it the pasts beginning (Chuwen/B’atz’), and they believed that he would develop for 18 years and when he was grown the Great Cycle would end and Pauahtun would reign four nights in one and through a Son become no longer indifferent and a new phase in creation would begin. They calculated the precise date to the day, using a base 20 counting system modified by 18 to count the days and a different system to count 20 named days by 13 to keep track of what day it was, and they counted the nights in circles of 9, they counted for 12 Baktun or 5,125 years, They counted to the moment prophesized when Pauahtun, the Aged Quadripartite God, reigned four nights in one at the beginning and the end, and the Son did appear like they foretold
The joke with this paragraph is the Spanish burnt this book. I forget which apostle, but one of them argued that we must not worry about the hour and day. So it is funny because it is like he could not do it, but apparently the Maya could.
But if you want to see something really interesting which also answers the question people who think I have been waiting to long might have, namely, why now? then you would want to look at the occurrence of G9 and its alignment the T’zokin, Long Count and others various cultures calendars and holidays. look at the dates of the holidays which occur between 3 Ok followed by the lord of night G9 and 4 Chuwen followed by G9 this year.
The names we are born with are something we do not decide they are given to us. It is out of our control. We are able to give ourselves new names. But never will we not have been who we are.
This section details why Jesse Weir is the most meaningful name for Christ to have again.
What I was Named
My name is Jesse Weir.
It was once said by a prophet that the stump of Jesse would yield a fruit which would be a righteous Judge of the world.
I am aware that quote refers to the lineage of king David, but it is also a name. The fruit of Jesse is still Jesse. If it were supposed to mean a descendant of Jesse was to be the anointed one then the metaphor would have referred to the seed of the tree. Moreover, it is not impossible that I am actually a descendant of Jesse, it is just unverifiable.
Now Lets talk about my last name. I was born into the Weir family. Both my parents are good people. Our most famous relative is probably Robert Stanley Weir who translated a French hymn into English and got it to become the Canadian national anthem. It is called “Oh Canada”. At some point some one added the line asking God to “keep our land glorious and free”. I want to make all people’s lands glorious and free.
Moreover, when you think about the meaning of the word weir, you will see that a weir is a barrier which holds back water with out stopping it. Since God’s wrath is most evident in the story of the flood, a weir could be seen as something holding back the waters, or keeping with the analogy, God’s wrath.
If you put these two names together you arrive at the name Jesse Weir. Yet It is a name I always struggled to say. Let me explain why. Due to genetic inabilities, I could not say a number of sounds as a child. (see the introduction to the fourth video for more information about this and the document on the right for proof of what I am saying.) The most difficult letter was “R” but “SE” was hard to. This meant that when I would say my first and last name, it would sound something like this depending on how tiered I was: Jescowa, Jesce Wei, Yesooiwa, Yeshua, or Jeshua. I was raised atheist, which meant that when I was a child, I never really heard about God or Jesus outside of a small Christmas book. Therefore, there was no way I would have heard or read Jesus’ real name. Therefore when I would say my name was Jeshua because of muscle failure, I think my body knew something I didn’t. It knew that Jeshua, in Aramaic, or Yeshua, in Hebrew, means Salvation, but it is commonly translated into English as Jesus.
According to the Gospel of Philip, Christ is the revealed name and can be translated, but Jeshua (𐡉𐡔𐡅𐡏) is the hidden name and cannot be translated nor can it change.
The failure to speak my given name articulated my true name.
And this is my favorite way to spell it. For some more on this see the video 2 page on this website
For a more thorough analysis of my name check out my Videos 2 Page below.
ܝܫܘܥ
Specific bodies can do different things. My body does something that has only been theorized of but never verified, until now.
How My Body Moves
I don’t move normally.
I have a extremely rare mutation at the post-synaptic clef of my neuromuscular junctions acetylcholine receptors which, ultimately, produces muscle failure from excessive calcium levels or depleted calcium levels which under the appropriate conditions can create a impulse that leads to a contraction occurring without its own nerve impulse, and this can cause, a so to speak, out of sync contraction which causes muscle tissue to snag on itself, and this creates a self lacerating circular movement.
So I have a immediate contraction since it originates in the muscle; I have a blind or unconscious contraction since it occurs involuntarily; I have a self-lacerating contraction since the muscles destructively rip or tear, or technically create scission in themselves. (See the introduction to the fourth video for more information on this and my page Part 4 Work ).
Click here to access a more comprehensive analysis of this section
What makes this even more peculiar is that God’s formation was the subject matter of this old book called “The Ages or the World” by Fedrick Wilhelm Joseph Schelling. It describes the defining characteristic of God’s formation as a self-lacerating circular movement of contraction and expansion. God becomes God when He overcomes this necessary condition of its nature. His account parallels a number of other traditions.
A philosopher named Slavoj Žižek summarizes the first draft of “The Ages of the World” in his essay “The Abyss of Freedom”:
In the first draft. the primordial Freedom qua Will that wants nothing “contracts” being – that is, condenses itself into a contracted point of material density – of necessity, not through an act of free decision: the primordial contraction cannot not happen, since it derives from primordial Freedom in an absolutely immediate, “blind,” nonreflected unaccountable, way. The first inner tension of the Absolute is here the tension between expansive freedom and the blind necessity of contraction.
Žižek, Slavoj. The Abyss of Freedom, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1997.
It is important to note that I am not claiming to be the primordial being that Shelling is talking about, although that is possible, but the explanation would be weird. What I am actually saying is that the internal movement that I must necessarily do, can’t opt out of, is a perfect analogy occurring in human flesh for the process that the absolute or divine potencies of God is going through. While essentially inarticulable, Schelling never finished the book, the visual medium that only recently became possible now enables me with his partnership to not articulate it perfectly, but it let us directly show you what’s going on in the “mind” of God directly (this is what the fourth video is showing you). But it is not so much the body as the primordial act. Therefore, Žižek is mistaken: the primordial contraction is not unaccountable and in fact as been accounted for. This is key to understanding my claim to the title of Christ because it means that I am a verifiable example of just what the divine potencies would appear like. Moreover, though I must state that I do not claim to show the whole book, or every single stage of the development of God.
(I use the term mind here, but it is inaccurate because it is really the passage from body to spirit through the soul, the term “mind” is a fictional construct used by physicalist who believe in nothing but the physicalists to, with one hand, talk about spirt even though they can not conceive of it, and with other hand, dismiss anything non physical as mental, sick, delusional, or mentally ill, any who claims to be an expert in something “mental” is saying the equivalent of I am an expert in a fictional construct, if they want their concepts pertaining to what is then they must give up their reductive physicalism and recognize the unseeable world of spirit.)
The important qualities to take away from this passage are as follows:
Contraction
Material density
Necessary
Not free
Deriving from freedom
Immediate
Blind
Nonreflected
The qualities unaccountable and cannot happen are just Žižek’s opinion. If we can verify it happening, then we have proven his opinion to be false.
You have to do more work to really understand this piece of evidence.
